Date: 
Sep 6, 2017
Author: 
Tomás O'Leary
Date: 
6/9/2017
Auteur: 
Tomás O'Leary
Datum: 
6.9.2017
Author: 
Tomás O'Leary

As IBM software reaches end of warranty, the software asset manager and the CTO face a significant strategic decision. Do they take the OEM-defined route and carry out a platform upgrade, or do they take a different direction?

Reducing costs is paramount

Despite being critical to business operations, the IT department is under constant pressure to reduce costs. IBM’s plan to push you towards an upgrade is also financially motivated, encouraging your business to spend more on new licenses, maintenance contracts, and possibly even hardware to support the updated application.

Keen to avoid increased spend, many CTOs swing to the opposite end of the spectrum, investigating the use of Open Source alternatives. With minimal or no license costs and the potential to re-use existing hardware platforms, Open Source technologies sound the like the answer to a cash-strapped CTO’s prayers.

Cutting through the Open Source license comparison hype

The almost-free license costs of Open Source can blind finance-obsessed C-Suite executives who see an opportunity to slash costs immediately. The headline savings mask some significant secondary costs however that need to be considered more carefully.

New deployment costs

Every new software project incurs costs, from external consultancy fees, to the time spent by the in-house IT team as the plan, implement and manage the application. Indeed, the internal resources diverted to these deployment projects are resources that must be diverted from other tasks, potentially affecting other line-of-business operations.

Migration costs

As the new application takes over from the incumbent IBM platform, there will need to be a period of coexistence and migration. This means a cash outlay on running the two systems simultaneously, extracting and transforming data for import into the new platform and potentially keeping the now-redundant system online, to access legacy data, or as a back-up as the new system “beds in”.

Productivity costs

No matter how much training you give employees in advance, there will always be a drop in productivity as people adjust to the new workflows and processes. Even if you manage to completely replicate existing workflows, a basic change in user interface layout could have a major effect on output.

The lag between deployment and employee familiarity will add to the overall cost of the project, even if this additional spend is not immediately obvious to the CFO.

The road less travelled - a third option

The “free” price tag attached to Open Source software can blind the SAM to a third option – doing nothing. In most cases, your IBM software continues to function perfectly – after several years of tweaking and testing, the application is stable and reliable.

In fact, the only reason you’re even considering an upgrade is because IBM are withdrawing support for your application.

This is where third party support can help. By leaving IBM you get to keep your existing set-up and reduce your maintenance costs. Suddenly the switch to “free” software looks a lot less attractive. Sticking with the systems you and your employees know avoids new deployment costs, migration costs and any drop in productivity – the only changes take place at the administrative level with no knock-on effect on your operations.

With this in mind there is no Open Source license comparison – third party maintenance is the smartest option for your business, especially as you try to drive your costs lower.

To learn more about third party IBM software maintenance and how Origina can help, please get in touch.

Third-Party-Support-Maintenance-ebook-CTA



Recent Posts

"Sorry it’s just our policy"
In regard to your IBM software support, don’t settle for “It’s just our policy”, bad customer service, long SLA times or overpriced support.
How to reduce IBM support costs using third-party support
Although IT budgets have been increasingly over the past few years, CIOs are expected to make that cash stretch further than ever before.
Software contracts - Is this what Stockholm syndrome feels like!
Businesses are suffering, conditioned by software contracts vendors to believe they have absolutely no choice but to accept audits, annual charge uplifts.

AKTUELLE POSTS

Ihr guter Vorsatz fürs neue Jahr – Kosten senken
Verabschieden Sie sich von erzwungenen Upgrades und genießen Sie 2019, glücklich unterstützt von Ihrem Vorsatz fürs neue Jahr.
Wie wirkt sich der Verkauf älterer IBM-Software an HCL auf IBM-Kunden aus?
Wie sich die Übernahme von IBM-Software durch HCL auf bestehende IBM-Kunden auswirken wird
Märchenstunde: 5 „Fakten“ über Software-Audits, die Sie nicht glauben sollten
Um IBM-Audits ranken sich zahlreiche Mythen und Unwahrheiten. Hier sind fünf, die Sie auf keinen Fall glauben sollten.

ARTICLES RÉCENTS

Votre résolution pour la nouvelle année: réduire les coûts
Dites adieu aux mises à niveau forcées et profitez de 2019 avec le soutien de votre résolution du Nouvel An promise.
À quoi peuvent s’attendre les clients IBM après la vente de ses logiciels hérités à HCL ?
En quoi l’acquisition de logiciels IBM par HCL affectera-t-elle les clients IBM existants ?
Survivre à l’échec d’un audit de licences logicielles
Un jour ou l’autre, votre entreprise échouera à un audit IBM : voici comment survivre à cette défaillance