Rethinking Vulnerability Exposure: Why Leaders Are Looking Beyond Patch Velocity

For many organizations, vulnerability exposure has become one of the most difficult and persistent challenges in their security programs. Technology stacks continue to expand, systems grow more interconnected, and operational demands make it harder than ever for infrastructure and operations (I&O) teams to implement changes quickly and safely. Against this backdrop, patching has traditionally been treated as the default solution — the one lever organizations feel they can reliably pull to reduce security risk.

Yet in our experience at Origina, patching alone is no longer enough. Modern IT environments introduce complexity, interdependencies, and business constraints that make rapid remediation far more difficult than it appears on paper. Meanwhile, threat conditions evolve faster than most teams can respond, and the consequences of an unexpected outage are often just as severe as those of a security incident itself.

This tension — between the need to fix vulnerabilities and the need to maintain system stability — is something we hear from enterprise leaders every day. And it’s one of the reasons we believe the Gartner® research We’re Not Patching Our Way Out of Vulnerability Exposure is an important resource for organizations re-evaluating how they approach security and operational resilience.

Why the Industry Conversation Is Shifting

Over the last several years, we’ve seen a notable shift in how enterprises think about vulnerability exposure. In the past, success was often measured through patch compliance metrics: how quickly patches were applied, how many were outstanding, and how well teams were meeting internal SLAs. While these measurements still play a role, they no longer capture the full picture of risk.

From our perspective, organizations are increasingly grappling with three intersecting realities:

1. The pace of vulnerability disclosure is outstripping the ability to remediate. Even highly mature teams struggle to keep pace with the volume of issues identified across operating systems, middleware, applications, and cloud environments. The idea of “patch everything quickly” is no longer practical — nor is it risk-based.
2. Patching intersects with business-critical workloads. Many enterprise systems have significant integration footprints, tight uptime requirements, or dependencies that make unplanned changes risky. A single faulty patch or compatibility issue can create outages that lead to downstream customer disruption or financial impact.
3. Not every vulnerability meaningfully increases risk. In our view, prioritizing vulnerabilities based only on technical severity can mislead teams into focusing on issues that pose far less threat to their specific environments. Context matters — sometimes more than the vulnerability itself.

These realities make it clear that leaders need a broader, more evidence-based framework for reducing exposure. This is where threat-informed approaches — including mitigation, controls, and contextual analysis — become essential complements to remediation.

Why We Believe Gartner’s Research Is Helpful for Today’s Security Landscape

The Gartner report provides considerations we believe are especially relevant to organizations navigating these modern exposure management challenges. In our opinion, the research prompts valuable reflection on how teams balance stability, security, and operational feasibility in a constantly shifting environment.

For example, we feel the research surfaces the importance of understanding exposure in the context of the entire attack surface — not just the vulnerabilities present on a single system or within a single platform. Similarly, we believe it encourages organizations to think more critically about where and how remediation efforts should be prioritized, when mitigation actions may be appropriate, and what collaboration between I&O and security should look like to support shared outcomes.

These are themes we’ve long seen reflected in conversations with the global enterprises we serve. They also connect directly to Origina’s own philosophy: that security and stability are not competing priorities, but intertwined responsibilities requiring thoughtful, context-driven decision making.

Origina’s View: Patching Is One Control — Not the Strategy

Origina’s position has always centered on a simple idea: enterprises deserve the freedom to choose the most appropriate, least disruptive path to stability and security. Patching plays an important role in that picture, but it shouldn’t be treated as the sole mechanism for reducing exposure.

In our experience working with organizations running large, mission-critical IBM, HCL, and VMware environments, leaders often face meaningful constraints:

• Systems that cannot be taken offline easily
• Applications with dependencies that delay safe patch deployment
• Vendor upgrade paths that introduce unnecessary change
• Situations where no patch exists at all
• Environments where the operational risk of change outweighs the risk of exploitation

In these cases, patching aggressively — or prematurely — does not reduce risk. It may increase it.
That’s why we strongly believe in a contextual, multi-layered approach to exposure reduction. This includes mitigation actions, architectural analysis, environmental hardening, and prioritization grounded in real-world conditions rather than theoretical severity. The end goal is not to chase patch velocity, but to improve resilience.

Where Organizations Can Begin Reframing Their Approach

While every organization’s environment is different, several mindset shifts can help leaders build a more balanced and pragmatic security posture:

• Treat vulnerability exposure as a strategic risk, not just an operational burden. Exposure is a continuous condition — not a project to be completed.
• Align remediation priorities to system criticality and operational impact. Not all vulnerabilities carry the same weight in every environment.
• Use mitigation actions confidently and deliberately. Mitigation is not a shortcut; it’s a legitimate and often essential security practice.
• Strengthen collaboration between I&O and security teams. Unified decision-making reduces friction and improves outcomes.
• Build processes that reflect real-world complexity. Models that ignore environmental dependencies lead to unrealistic expectations — and unnecessary outages.

At Origina, we support organizations in this shift by providing independent expertise, contextual analysis, and mitigation guidance that complements internal security efforts without forcing disruptive or unnecessary vendor-driven changes.

Explore the Research Driving This Conversation

We believe the Gartner research We’re Not Patching Our Way Out of Vulnerability Exposure is an important resource for any organization reassessing how it manages vulnerability risk in today’s complex environments.

You can access the full report here:

Download the Gartner® Report on Vulnerability Exposure Management 

Looking to secure your software estate today? Get in touch with Origina.